It’s only two games, but maybe we all were a little too enthusiastic to jump on the Josh Smith bandwagon. In Smith’s case, there was some evidence (namely, actual games last year) to suggest that he could play as a top 25 caliber player for a stretch of games. What there wasn’t; evidence that he could play at that high level for an entire year. Still, over the course of the summer and fall, many “experts†out there had him consistently high on their lists and draft sheets. And BAM – he became a consensus 2nd to 3rd round pick after a good month and a half to end last season.
If it’s tough enough to predict a guy’s performance based upon experience, then to do it based on speculation is folly. I’m referring to the sleeper lists that bombard us each October, predicting breakout players using some mysteriously set of criteria like “opportunityâ€, “experienceâ€, and “potentialâ€. Of course, we all like these lists and use them to inform us for our drafts. But, do these lists actually help? For example, what if you used this sleeper list last year to fill out your 2005 draft?
To summarize, the following 10 sleepers appeared on the above list. I’ve put their final 05/06 player rank in parenthesis.
1. Stromile Swift (210)
2. Damon Stoudamire (113 in 27 games)
3. Al Jefferson (203)
4. Luol Deng (95)
5. Shaun Livingston (172)
6. Zaza Pachulia (104)
7. T.J. Ford (84)
8. Marc Jackson (291)
9. Raja Bell (62)
10. J.R. Smith (233)
Or, what if you used this sleeper and bust list?
Top 5 Sleepers
1) T.J. Ford (84)
2) Tyson Chandler (145)
3) Shaun Livingston (172)
4) Josh Howard (83)
5) Nenad Krstic (117)
Top 5 Busts
1) Antoine Walker (112)
2) Chris Webber (32)
3) Marvin Williams (212)
4) Joe Johnson (23)
5) Damon Stoudamire (113 in 27 games)
Putting aside the fact that Stoudamire appeared both as a sleeper and a bust and that I wouldn’t have considered TJ Ford a sleeper last year, one probably would have been better off actively ignoring these lists going into a draft. Looking at the first list, if you managed to grab three of those 10 players, chances are that 1 would have been merely worth the pick, while 2 would have been outright busts. The second list isn’t any better – steering people away from both Webber and Johnson – while providing a list of sleepers who I can only describe as “mehâ€. You completely get what I mean, right? I’m not trying to pick on anyone in particular, I’m sure if I had made a list of sleepers (I didn’t), I guarantee it wouldn’t have been any better. The point is that you should be dubious of all these sleeper/bust lists. They are almost always built upon speculation and personal opinion. Enjoy them, criticize them, just don’t take these lists too seriously.