Comments on: Fantasy Basketball Roundtable: Least Fantasy-Friendly Team http://givemetherock.com/2010/01/21/fantasy-basketball-roundtable-least-fantasy-friendly-team/ this is fantasy basketball Sat, 19 May 2012 15:48:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: New sport http://givemetherock.com/2010/01/21/fantasy-basketball-roundtable-least-fantasy-friendly-team/comment-page-1/#comment-5020 New sport Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:48:08 +0000 http://givemetherock.com/?p=6565#comment-5020 I comment of the great ADA sport will unite the world. Thanks to the Internet and mobile phones, there are no political, religious, bureaucratic or territorial borders I comment of the great ADA sport will unite the world. Thanks to the Internet and mobile phones, there are no political, religious, bureaucratic or territorial borders

]]> By: jdunnisher http://givemetherock.com/2010/01/21/fantasy-basketball-roundtable-least-fantasy-friendly-team/comment-page-1/#comment-4951 jdunnisher Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:53:06 +0000 http://givemetherock.com/?p=6565#comment-4951 Oh, okay... so you didn't look at entire NBA rosters, just those who cracked the top 156. I guess as I re-read the post, that is pretty clear. I'm not sure what I was reading the first time through. Thanks for clarifying. Oh, okay… so you didn't look at entire NBA rosters, just those who cracked the top 156. I guess as I re-read the post, that is pretty clear. I'm not sure what I was reading the first time through. Thanks for clarifying.

]]> By: nelswadycki http://givemetherock.com/2010/01/21/fantasy-basketball-roundtable-least-fantasy-friendly-team/comment-page-1/#comment-4949 nelswadycki Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:29:19 +0000 http://givemetherock.com/?p=6565#comment-4949 We took the Top 156 players from the GMTR Player Rater. 12 teams x 13 players per team = 156 players. So, anyone outside of the Top 156 shouldn't be on a team. Yes, there are some holes in that theory/assumption, but really, adding players outside of the Top 156 doesn't make that much of a difference in where teams end up, and especially not for the best and worst teams. We took the Top 156 players from the GMTR Player Rater. 12 teams x 13 players per team = 156 players. So, anyone outside of the Top 156 shouldn't be on a team. Yes, there are some holes in that theory/assumption, but really, adding players outside of the Top 156 doesn't make that much of a difference in where teams end up, and especially not for the best and worst teams.

]]> By: jdunnisher http://givemetherock.com/2010/01/21/fantasy-basketball-roundtable-least-fantasy-friendly-team/comment-page-1/#comment-4947 jdunnisher Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:57:08 +0000 http://givemetherock.com/?p=6565#comment-4947 How deep on each team's roster did you go when running this analysis? Obviously, it would make more sense to only include actual rotation players (usally the top 9-10 guys per team) than to include everyone that rides the pine or alternates back-and-forth between the D-League. Just curious? How deep on each team's roster did you go when running this analysis? Obviously, it would make more sense to only include actual rotation players (usally the top 9-10 guys per team) than to include everyone that rides the pine or alternates back-and-forth between the D-League. Just curious?

]]> By: nelswadycki http://givemetherock.com/2010/01/21/fantasy-basketball-roundtable-least-fantasy-friendly-team/comment-page-1/#comment-4945 nelswadycki Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:06:16 +0000 http://givemetherock.com/?p=6565#comment-4945 The Spurs are actually closer to the top (but mostly in the middle). I also actually guessed the Spurs (also without looking at the #s). I think because the guys they do have are very efficient with their time on the floor, they get it done even with the slow pace.<br><br>The Bucks are a lot closer to the bottom. Now that Michael Redd is out, they might actually end up the season as the worst team. They already charted only 4 players, which was tied for second worst. Of course, Redd was actually kind of low on the rater at the time I pulled the stats, so taking him off might actually raise their average. The Spurs are actually closer to the top (but mostly in the middle). I also actually guessed the Spurs (also without looking at the #s). I think because the guys they do have are very efficient with their time on the floor, they get it done even with the slow pace.

The Bucks are a lot closer to the bottom. Now that Michael Redd is out, they might actually end up the season as the worst team. They already charted only 4 players, which was tied for second worst. Of course, Redd was actually kind of low on the rater at the time I pulled the stats, so taking him off might actually raise their average.

]]> By: Terrance http://givemetherock.com/2010/01/21/fantasy-basketball-roundtable-least-fantasy-friendly-team/comment-page-1/#comment-4942 Terrance Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:17:38 +0000 http://givemetherock.com/?p=6565#comment-4942 I wouldve said the spurs without looking at the #s.the bucks kinda came to mind. but they have a couple guys who are just OK I wouldve said the spurs without looking at the #s.the bucks kinda came to mind. but they have a couple guys who are just OK

]]> By: Terrance http://givemetherock.com/2010/01/21/fantasy-basketball-roundtable-least-fantasy-friendly-team/comment-page-1/#comment-4943 Terrance Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:17:38 +0000 http://givemetherock.com/?p=6565#comment-4943 I wouldve said the spurs without looking at the #s.the bucks kinda came to mind. but they have a couple guys who are just OK I wouldve said the spurs without looking at the #s.the bucks kinda came to mind. but they have a couple guys who are just OK

]]>