Give Me The Rock » Blog Archive » Draft Strategy: Playing the Percentages

Give Me The Rock

this is fantasy basketball 
  • GMTR Sponsors


    Play a variety of free slot machines online or visit VPR for information on video poker games and where to play securely.

    Shop residential adjustable basketball hoops at Sports Unlimited.

    fantasypa
  • Fantasy Sports

    Get This or Add Your Feed <a href="http://fantasyknuckleheads.com" title="Fantasy Football Rankings, Fantasy Football Sleepers, Fantasy football start sit, fantasy football waiver wire."><b>Fantasy Football for all you knuckleheads</b></a>

    Powered By: Fantasy Knuckleheads


  • Draft Strategy: Playing the Percentages

    There are as many draft strategies out there as Lindsay Lohan court appearances, but the one I’ve grown particularly fond of recently is drafting for percentages. The tough thing about this strategy is that it requires the ability focus in on a particular set of players during and after a draft and completely ignore others, but I swear it seems to work for me more than any other strategy I’ve tried.

    Now I’ve discussed effective percentages what seems like ad nauseum on GMTR, but it’s the concept of adjusting a player’s shooting percentages by the number of shots that they take compared to league average. This allows an apple-to-apples comparison between players by imagining what would happen if they all took the same number of shots.

    Kevin Durant may have shot 88% from the line last season, but since he took 8.7 free throws a game, it’s the fantasy equivalent of him hitting 100% of his free throws if he only took the league average number. Similarly, a guy like Steve Nash shoots a higher percentage from the line than Durant, but has less of an overall effect on a fantasy team since he only averages about 3 free throws a game.

    Confusing? Maybe. But here is a list of effective percentages for the 2010-11 season if you want to check it out.

    ***

    The main reason to draft for percentages is because it’s the best way injury-proof your team. While the other standard statistical categories used in fantasy basketball leagues (points, rebounds, etc) are counting stats, percentages are ratio stats. It doesn’t matter how many free throws your team takes, just what percentage of those shots they make. Your fantasy team somehow went 1 for 1 from the line for the week? Great, you win that category.*

    So while injuries may chip away at your fantasy team in the counting categories, they have much less of an effect on the percentage categories (unless you happen to replace your efficient scorer with a chucker while he’s injured). When players have nagging injuries causing them to miss a game or two during the week, it’s going to hurt your point and rebound totals, but those percentage categories won’t necessarily be affected.

    And in the inevitable case where your team completely blows out with injuries, you can use the FG%, FT% and TO categories as a life preserver until your team gets healthy again. Going 3-6 on the week in an H2H league isn’t great, but at least it spares you the embarrassment of a couple 0-9 or 1-8 weeks.

    Percentages are just two categories out of 8 or 9, so they should not be the primary factor you use when drafting a player. The goal is still to rack up more points, rebounds and assists than anyone else. But when you are deciding between two equally good players, try using their shooting efficiency as a tie breaker. To help me do that, I like to group players into three categories during a draft.

    Group A: The plus efficiency guys. Kevin Durant, Chris Paul, Dirk Nowitzki, etc.

    Group B. They won’t kill you. Includes most of the league. Think LeBron James and Dwyane Wade.

    Group C. The category killers. Dwight Howard, Demarcus Cousins, Trevor Ariza.

    The goal using this strategy is to pull as many guys from group A as possible during a draft. However, there will be times based on the position of the draft or your team need where you’ll have to dig into the group B pool of players, which is fine. Of course, avoiding players in Group C is absolutely necessarily if you want to draft for percentages.

    ***

    So, what does the start of an efficiency-based draft look like?

    You have the 1st pick in the draft: Kevin Durant

    It’s the easiest decision that you’ll have to make in any draft. In addition to being an all around fantasy beast, Durant is the league’s second best free throw shooter (only Kevin Martin was better last year), hitting 88% of 8.7 free throws a game he took in 2011-12. His FG% is right around league average, which isn’t great, but it’s acceptable given his position and the fact that he scores nearly 30 points a game.

    Follow it up with: A high FG% guy like Lamarcus Aldridge or Al Horford.

    You have a mid-first round draft pick: Chris Paul/Kevin Love

    Paul was briefly traded to the Lakers last night before several owners cried to the commissioner and the trade was blocked. From a fantasy perspective, it would have been nice to see Paul running with talented scorers like Kobe and Bynum (no offense Trevor Ariza), but even on the Hornets or mystery team X, Paul is going to make his magic happen. Paul was a 50% shooter from the floor before last season’s down year, plus he shot 88% from the line to go along with 10 assists a game.

    With Love, his 47% shooting and 85% from line are just gravy on top of an insane 20 and 15 per game scoring/rebounding averages. He may not bring the blocks of Dwight Howard, but not too many guys in the league will let you lock up the rebounding category while also contributing positively in percentages.

    Follow it up with: A big man like Aldridge, Al Jefferson or Horford for Paul. Love probably has the toughest pairing here. You could go big again with one of the guys above, or draft a scorer like Carmelo Anthony (who was surprisingly efficient once he joined the Knicks) or Rudy Gay. A PG in this spot would be tough to come by.

    You have a late-first round draft pick: Stephen Curry/Pau Gasol/Dirk Nowitzki/Amare Stoudemire

    Picking at or near the turn in a draft gives you the most flexibility when building a team. Since PGs and Cs are always at a premium, why not grab one who is a plus in the percentages categories? Ok, Dirk doesn’t qualify at center, but Gasol and Amare will in most leagues. Amare is the riskiest play here both in terms of health and how he’s going to mesh long term with Melo, but if he falls to the second round a Curry/Amare pairing would be a great 1-2 combo.

    Like Paul, Curry is a plus guy at both percentage categories, which is amazing since he also hit 2 threes a game last year. He took the least number of free throws out of any first rounder last season (only 3.1 per game), but he hit them at a 94% clip, which is good for an effective FT% of 90%.

    Follow it up with: Stephen Curry/Pau Gasol/Dirk Nowitzki/Amare Stoudemire/Carmelo Anthony

    There is nothing wrong with getting your two bigs out of the way in the first two rounds, but the real prize here would be coming away with Curry in one of these spots.

    As you move down the draft

    There are good percentage guys at just about any spot in the draft if you look hard enough. After the second round, Steve Nash is a guy to target if you need a PG. Chris Bosh, David Lee, David West, Elton Brand and Brook Lopez all big men who can hit the free throw. Paul Pierce and Ray Allen are old, but they are some of the best all-around percentage guys in the league. In terms of young players, Serge Ibaka is decent from the line for a big man, Demar Derozan was a plus-plus percentages guy in 82 games for the Raptors, Wesley Matthews had decent percentages for a SG last year and Nicolas Batum is an efficient player with some breakout potential this season.

    *Unless your league has a minimum requirement for shots taken

    Other Stuff Like This:

    Tags: , ,

    • http://twitter.com/themigs Chris

      Do you suggest any particular numbers as rough cut-off points for what defines a Type A player?

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      For simplicity sake, what I do is head into a draft with a list of what I consider the top 5-7 percentage guys at each position along with their overall draft rank. Then try to pick guys off that list as the draft moves along. That’s easier for me to do than to worry too much about exact numbers, especially during a timed draft.

    • Vivek90244

      great work as always!!! what r ur thoughts of DJ Augustine & Kemba Walker?  how many minutes and what round drafted are you projecting for each of them? someone has to score on that team, with Maggette always getting hurt & henderson coming off hip surgey

      thanks, 
      VP

    • RM

      FG/FT/3PM/TO is a pretty logical pairing of stats to corner with this strategy. You should also target the flip side of effective percentages, players who have abysmal %’s but don’t shoot enough to make a dent on a team, like Varejao or DeAndre Jordan. Who cares if Jordan goes 1/2 in FT’s every game for 50% when you have Curry making 10/11 FTs a night.

    • RM

      Oh and also steals. I meant to say Durant not Curry about my FT remark.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PQMKBW24TBUWZGAJ7UXNWDR3BM Hats

      So if you have Rondo and K Mart or Gordon is available which do you take?  And does a bad ft% and a great ft% cancel each other out? 

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      We currently have all three ranked around the same area for the upcoming season. And while I really want to like Kevin Martin, I’ve just been burned by him too many times in the past. Waaaay too many times. I do like rondo, but I’d be contracting this point of this post if I recommend him over Gordon. So Gordon it is – and he should be strong this year.

      Drafting a great FT% guy and a bad one does cancel each other out in a sense, but it’s no different than any other category. I personally like to think of the categories in terms of a whole team. I want to try and hit an overall certain team FT% – say 82% – and I’ll gladly draft any combination of players to hit that mark, even if some of them aren’t the greatest FT%. The same thing can be done for the other categories as well.

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      We don’t have a lot of information on how that Augustin/Walker split is going to work – in fact Walker still hasn’t officially signed with the team last time I checked. In my first round of projections, I had them splitting minutes evenly for lack of a better idea. But Augustin will benefit from the short camp and will probably end up the better pick this season. Although both are back end draft picks this year.

      Sadly, this is the perfect Maggette team. He’ll be the guy to lead them in scoring provided he can stay healthy. Although that isn’t saying much.

    • Pingback: Give Me The Rock » Blog Archive » Real Draft Results: GMTR Readers League