Give Me The Rock » Blog Archive » The Top 150 Fantasy Basketball Players for 2011-12

Give Me The Rock

this is fantasy basketball 
  • GMTR Sponsors


    Play a variety of free slot machines online or visit VPR for information on video poker games and where to play securely.

    Shop residential adjustable basketball hoops at Sports Unlimited.

    fantasypa
  • Fantasy Sports

    Get This or Add Your Feed <a href="http://fantasyknuckleheads.com" title="Fantasy Football Rankings, Fantasy Football Sleepers, Fantasy football start sit, fantasy football waiver wire."><b>Fantasy Football for all you knuckleheads</b></a>

    Powered By: Fantasy Knuckleheads


  • The Top 150 Fantasy Basketball Players for 2011-12

    Author Icon for Patrick

    Categorized as: Author: Patrick, Fantasy Basketball, Fantasy Basketball Draft Guide 2011
    Posted on: December 9th, 2011

    Yes, we’ve finally complied our top 150 fantasy players for the 2011-12 season! With stat projections! Just in time for free agency to start and change everything! But in our defense, this crazy shortened timeline didn’t exactly leave us with a lot of time to get things done.

    We will continue to update the rankings as free agents are signed and big trades are made (or not), so keep checking in with GMTR. Also, make sure to bookmark our 2011-12 draft guide page where we will compile everything we do over the next few weeks into a single post.

    One note about rankings. The stat projections and rankings are (mostly) based on a statistical program that I wrote over the course of a few days that attempts model player performance based on their prior performance, best player comps, minutes played and a few other things. Nels, Erik and I then went in and made some final adjustments based on common sense, or at least what we think is common sense. You may disagree.

    Given that I developed this over a very short period of time – it’s rather crude in some areas – but for the most part the results seem to jive with reality. The program does hate a few players (like Kobe Bryant) so there will certainly be some controversial rankings that come out of this. I can already see people questioning our 6th ranked player, for example. But we always love your comments and opinions, so don’t be afraid to hit us up and tell us why you agree or disagree with these rankings.

    Other Stuff Like This:

    Tags: ,

    • wait what?

      Al Jefferson at 32?? Is that right?

    • Guest

      Yeah thats about 20 spots off. 

    • http://nelswadycki.com nelswadycki

      Yeah, might need to check his project numbers on there… They look low. I didn’t really notice that the first time through since there were a few other obvious outliers.

    • Billg

      JaVale McGee not in the top 150?  Are you kidding?

    • Eric

      Yeah… could we possibly get maybe some reasoning for some of the biggest outliers? Like Al Jefferson, Javale, etc. The lower numbers make sense because last time there was a lockout, apparently offensive numbers fell across the board. 

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      I stand by the Jefferson projection. There are a couple things not to like about him this year. First, last year not withstanding, his injury history hurts his projection. Second, as things stand right now the Jazz have both a healthy Okur and Enes Kanter to steal a few of his minutes this year. The Jazz might be looking to make a move before the start of the season, but for now that is where I believe Jefferson belongs.

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      I stand by the Jefferson projection. There are a couple things not to like about him this year. First, last year not withstanding, his injury history hurts his projection. Second, as things stand right now the Jazz have both a healthy Okur and Enes Kanter to steal a few of his minutes this year. The Jazz might be looking to make a move before the start of the season, but for now that is where I believe Jefferson belongs.

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      I’m out of town at the moment, but I’ll check to see what’s going on with the McGee projection when I get back home. He should be in the top 150.

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      I’m out of town at the moment, but I’ll check to see what’s going on with the McGee projection when I get back home. He should be in the top 150.

    • Simon

      Love the articles. The ranking is for 8 category leagues, right?  I decided to start a similar blog focused on 9 category leagues (includes TOs). Makes a big difference when you add in just that one stat.

      http://rotonba.posterous.com/

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      I should have mentioned that the rankings are indeed based on 9-cards, including TOs. But your right that the cats your league use makes a big difference on player value.

      Good luck with the blog!

    • GMTR fan

      can you guys help me out in choosing 4 keepers in a keeper league h2h 9 categories. my players are: dwade, zbo, al horford, bogut, dorell wright, wesley matthews, rodney stuckey, ryan anderson, toney douglas, ariza, big baby.

      dwade, zbo and horford are my sure picks but still debating on who to pick as the last keeper. bogut wesley matthews or dorell wright?

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      Both would make solid keepers, but my vote is for Wright who was a multi-cat beast last season. His one negative is FG%, but your team should be able to take it considering you already have Horford and Z-Bo. 

    • Daniel

      Underrated: LaMarcus Aldridge (19), Danny Granger (31), Al Jefferson (32), Gerald Wallace (56), Andrew Bynum (71), Wesley Matthews post-Roy debacle (75), Greg Monroe (80), Tyson Chandler (100), Marcin Gortat (116), Toney Douglas post-Billups (125), Ryan Anderson (129), maybe John Salmons (135) and JaVale McGee (-).

      Overrated: Russell Westbrook (6), Andre Iguodala (23), Jason Kidd (38), Mike Conley (39), Andray Blatche (53), Baron Davis (65), Shane Battier (69), Landry Fields (92), Tyrus Thomas (94), J.J. Hickson (102) and Corey Brewer (145).

    • Matthew

      I checked out Simon’s webpage above and I have to say, he knows what he is doing!  I was very impressed with logic and I think he has some great sleepers.  I hope nobody else in my league checks it out.

    • http://nelswadycki.com nelswadycki

      I’d go with Bogut in this case. Dorrell Wright is a close second, but with Bogut you have a solid 2nd-3rd tier player in a position that is very short on talent. With Horford and Bogut, you have 2 of the top 4 centers and since Center and PG are the position that people worry most about, I think it would be a good idea to lock that up.

      Like I said, Dorrell Wright is very tempting, and you wouldn’t be at all wrong to go with him, but certainly either of him or Bogut is a better choice than Matthews. The Blazers team, even without Brandon Roy, is far too crowded. Matthews is due for a 3rd year bump, but we don’t know what effect the shortened season will have on that kind of thing that we have begun to take for granted. I feel like Wright is also in a situation where there is a lot of talent around him, while Bogut is clearly the 1st or 2nd option on that team and there’s no one there after that (Stephen Jackson does not count).

    • Simon

      Thanks, Matthew! Feel free to provide comments and let me know what you like / dislike. Can’t be too prepared for that one draft!

    • Terrance

      I’d like to know if there is a way to group players together based on similar stat lines?

      Reason being that if I pass on let say pau gasol  in the first because I could get a player that provides similar stats in the 3rd…like david west, who is gasol minus blocks. That would allow me to take a player i value more for my team.

      I’m not going to make a terribly long winded post about this. I’d just like to know if it’s possible to group similar players together within 1 deviation of each other?

      furthermore, a spreadsheet on guards to have for big ball or midball teams. And yes, I’m asking for the world, but hopefully theres a topic in there that hasn’t been beat to death…because I know midball and big ball has been beat to death. And most of your readers understand the concepts and dont want to read much mroe about it :)

      Terrance

    • Terrance

      I’d like to know if there is a way to group players together based on similar stat lines?

      Reason being that if I pass on let say pau gasol  in the first because I could get a player that provides similar stats in the 3rd…like david west, who is gasol minus blocks. That would allow me to take a player i value more for my team.

      I’m not going to make a terribly long winded post about this. I’d just like to know if it’s possible to group similar players together within 1 deviation of each other?

      furthermore, a spreadsheet on guards to have for big ball or midball teams. And yes, I’m asking for the world, but hopefully theres a topic in there that hasn’t been beat to death…because I know midball and big ball has been beat to death. And most of your readers understand the concepts and dont want to read much mroe about it :)

      Terrance

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      I like to say that anything is possible – as long as you’ve got the time and the money. I have neither, but yeah, you can certainly group players together based on the similarity in their stats. In fact part of the way I projected player stats in our top 150 list for this season was to match similar players going back in time based on their stats and use those players’ year+1 season to calculate a projection. 

      I could rearrange the program to spit out a list of similar player comps (i.e., similarity scores) for the current season. I’ve done some work in the past on the topic and what you find is that the top guys in the league are pretty unique, but many guys in the mid and lower rounds are very similar in what they produce for fantasy teams.

      Great suggestions. We’ll see what we can do before the start of the season. 

    • Yayadia

      Thanks for the rankings.
      I haven’t played in a H2H league before, so how much I need to “invest” in a particular category to make it a strength?  For instance, if I take Dwight Howard, how many more rebounders do I need to usually secure REBs for an average week?  A few more average rebounding bigs?  1 more excellent rebounder?

    • Guest

      Hey Patrick,

      Is your rankings based on 9cat H2H?

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      Yes, they are based on 9cat H2H leagues, which is primarily what we play and what the GMTR readers’ leagues are. 

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      Good question, and one that depends on a number of factors, like the size of your league and the other owners in your league.

      What I can say that in a 12-team H2H league the average team would have netted something like 196 rebounds over the course of an average week in 2011-12. That’s 5.6 rebounds a game (the average from our top 140 players last season – and I went to 140 to account for injuries at any given point in time) * 10 starters per team *  3.5 games per week. 

      Howard averaged 14.1 rebounds per game, or about 49 per week. That means drafting Howard gets a team 25% of the rebounds you’ll need to get to that league average number. If all you did was draft Howard and put an average rebounding team around him, your team would net around 226 rebounds a week (with the understanding that there is a lot of variability in these numbers on a week-to-week basis) or 15% more than the first team.

      What complicates the question is what your fellow owners do in the league. At a minimum, some owner is going to get Kevin Love and another will have Blake Griffin, etc, so there will be other teams in the league that have rebounding as a strength. I am traveling and don’t have access to my NBA standard deviation numbers at the moment, but once I get back I can probably find a total number of rebounds per week in which you could reasonably expect to win boards against most teams most of the time. 

      My guess for now is that adding one good rebounder to Howard wouldn’t be enough, you’d probably need at least two if you wanted to make rebounding real team strength.

    • Aku218

      The rankings are well done, thank you. However, I know it’s still incomplete which is understandable, but I couldn’t help but to know why Joe Johnson is ranked so low and why Tony Allen is so high? This is accounting for Allen starting? Also with Crawford out, I expect Johnson to have a revival year.
      Other than that, good work, we all appreciate it!

    • http://nelswadycki.com nelswadycki

      My guess for Johnson is that most of (projected) numbers are just kind of mediocre. 18 points is all well and good, and 4.6 assists is nice for a SG, but 4.2 rebounds is a little closer to the Meh side while 0.6 steals and 0.1 blocks are kind of awful. The 1.3 threes are nice, but you only get 44% FG shooting (which is effectively lower because he takes so many shots) and 77% FT shooting (which doesn’t help that much since he takes so few shots). Overall, he’s just kind of decent and I think his ranking reflects that. The stat calculator that Patrick used actually had him much lower, but we bumped him up manually.

      Tony Allen’s strength comes mostly from his project 2.3 steals. That might be a bit high, but he did have 1.8 last season, so it’s not totally unheard of. The stat model also compared to historical players and how similar players played in the next year (so perhaps someone very similar to Allen who had 1.8 steals jumped to 2.3 the next year so the model thought that was a logical projection for him). Allen also has a nice FG% on a decent number of shots, so he will positively impact your team with that.

      The best I can say for a conclusion is that if you believe the projections in the spreadsheet, then the rankings are accurate. If you think Johnson will get back to 21-25 points per game, then obviously he’ll move up your list. And if you don’t think Allen will get that many steals nor shoot that well again, then you can move him down.

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      Basically, Nels hit it on the head. Take a look at Johnson’s
      per-36 minute averages over the last few seasons and you see that he’s trending
      in the wrong direction and off quite a bit from his age 25-27 peak. So the
      projections have his per-36 minute averages dropping again this season and his
      overall rank declining. The one thing I did not account for in version 1 of the
      projections is that Johnson’s minutes might bump slightly due to the departure
      of Crawford. I’ve given him a small minutes bump in version 2, but overall, I’m
      not that enthusiastic about Johnson.

      Allen’s rank was the result of him being projected as the Grizzlies starter. As
      Nels said, he averaged 1.8 steals in only 21 minutes a game last season and in
      the first round of the projections, I had him as the starter getting around 26
      minutes a game. After some thought, I think Allen is ranked a bit too high given
      his risk (thanks to the likely presence of OJ Mayo) so I tempered his
      projection a small bit in the new ranking list.

    • Aku281

      I see. Thanks for the replies guys, I see where you guys are coming from now.Continue the good work!

    • gmtrfan

      hey guys. really amped for the draft.

      i badly need a PG in a keeper league.

      who among the rookies do you think are the top 3 PGs that deserves some reaching? Rubio? Irving?

      Is it too early to draft them in the 5th round? Im asking because most of the top tier PGs are keepers of other teams. thanks!

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      Yeah McGee was accidently left out of the projections,
      likely because as the Wizards’ center, he was the last person on my player
      list. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. It has been fixed.

    • http://givemetherock.com/ Patrick

      With the latest Baron Davis news, Kyrie Irving will become the Cavs starting PG and now is – by far – the best rookie PG option this season. We’ve got him ranked at 67 overall in our latest rankings. That is a 5th/6th round pick in normal leagues. In a keeper league it depends on how many players are currently kept, but you are going to want to go in very early on him.

      Rubio we have ranked past 100 because of the uncertainty around how much playing time he’s going to get and the fact that he has some serious flaws in his game at the moment. I can envision a best case scenario where everything breaks right, he averages 30 minutes a game with high assists and steals. Again, it depends on how many players are kept, but Rubio could be worth a reach in the 5th/6th round, but that pick certainly carries a lot of risk with it.

      Toney Douglas is another PG who might be available. With Billups now gone, he’s going to be the Knicks starting PG and he comes off very well in our projections as a starter if you can live with his bad fg% numbers.